Benjamin and Bejocus

25 June · commentary

CONCERNING SS. BENJAMIN AND BEJOCUS

ANCHORITES IN EGYPT.

From the metrical Abyssinian Hagiology.

Commentary

Benjamin, Anchorite in Egypt (S.)

Bejocus, Anchorite in Egypt (S.)

D. P.

On the custom of the Anchorites of keeping the Eucharist Cardinal Bona, of Liturgical matters

book 2 chapter 18, about to demonstrate,

how usual always

was to the faithful Christians Communion

under a single species; when he had referred the Reader

to the examples of the preceding chapter,

of the Eucharist kept at home,

sent to the absent, and on long journeys

and voyages by the faithful carried;

namely to be taken in the sole species of bread; thus further

reasons: Nor otherwise did the Anchorites communicate

in the vast solitudes, than with the Particles,

which they carried with themselves, when on more solemn

feasts they came to church, or

to them the Priests sent or carried them.

[2] So altogether seem to have done SS. Benjamin

and Bejocus, whom the Ethiopian Hagiologist on this day

thus invokes; they seem to have had it too, I say salutation to Benjamin and Bejocus,

who persisted in assiduous prayers,

until to them was sent an Angel, ordering

them to eat the serpent, which had eaten of

the blessed body of Christ. For from this so

succinct brevity I can gather no other sense,

than that both those, in a little cupboard or some

hole of their cell or cave, but to have found it gnawed by a serpent; having laid up

the Body of the Lord, and it on the set day religiously

about to take, found a serpent, which had gnawed part.

Hence perplexed they hesitated, what they should do; and

the serpent indeed more cautiously kept alive or dead,

then in praying persisted, that they might be divinely taught

what was needful to be done: but an Angel sent

by God commanded, that they themselves should eat it;

and thereby learn, that it was as easy for Christ

to keep his Body from the serpent, as he preserved them

from its poison, if it had pleased him: and so

both their faith of the truth of the Eucharistic mystery he confirmed,

and at the same time made them more cautious in keeping it.

[3] therefore they seem to have been Egyptians, How holily they lived both before, and afterward,

must be learned from the Synaxaria of the nation, when

they shall be found. Meanwhile to the Anchorites of Egypt rather than

of Ethiopia, I prefer to reckon them: because of the Ethiopians

Job Ludolf the renowned man asserts, in book 3 of the History

of Ethiopia chapter 6 number 80, that their sacrificial bread,

which they call Corban, daily fresh

they bake, and wonder that the Latins keep it

for the morrow: and number 83, that outside the sacred building,

into private houses to carry the Mysteries, the greatest

wickedness they think; and that this neither the King, not Ethiopians. nor

the Metropolitan would arrogate to himself. But this

superstitiously rather than religiously, while with all the other

Churches of the East, even (unless I am mistaken) with the Egyptians

it was once the custom, to carry it to one's home; and

even now it is usual, to keep the same in the churches

for the use of the sick, as often as necessity

requires it. And perhaps, as to the first point,

nothing else is intended, than that in Abyssinia bread is not

used for the Sacrifice except baked on that very day; but consecrated,

as also among us, is kept: for (to say nothing of

the sick) to infants they are wont with Baptism to confer it:

but who would believe that none are baptized,

except at the time of Mass? I define nothing, but to a further

disquisition I willingly leave matters so far distant.

Feedback

Noticed an error, have a suggestion, or want to share a thought? Let me know.