ON SAINT LEO II,
ROMAN PONTIFF.
A.D. 684.
A PRELIMINARY CHRONOLOGICAL SYNOPSIS.
Leo II, Roman Pontiff (S.)
D. P.
On the 28th day of June, the old Church of Rome
celebrated the feast of S. Leo the Pope
I, on account of a certain translation of his:
which afterward it seemed ought rather to be celebrated yearly on that very day,
on which his Body was first
delivered to burial in the basilica of S. Peter, On which day Leo I was translated, on the 11th day of April; on which also now
he is venerated; although otherwise he died on the 30th day of the preceding
October, in the year 461. On the same 28th day of June, in the years
thence 223, in the year of Christ 684, in the same place
was solemnly entombed S. Leo II; having died (as to us at least
it seems) on the 23rd of May preceding, and for a time
deposited in the Lateran Basilica, Leo II was deposited in the Vatican, like others everywhere;
often several months elapsing between the first and second deposition;
and the second only was inscribed in the Vatican Fasti,
as elsewhere has been shown.
[2] Labbe confesses, renowned for several books published into the light,
and of the history of the Pontiffs and Councils, if any other,
knowing; that in the whole series of the Roman Pontiffs, whose most intricate Pontificate
scarcely anything occurs more intricate than the beginning,
deeds, and death of Leo the Pope the second. I, adding
by interchanging between themselves the spaces, both of the See vacant before,
which was defined as one year, 7 months, 5 days;
and of the same obtained, which was said to have been 10 months, 18 days.
So after the death of his predecessor Agatho,
who died on the 1st of November of the year 681, I seem to have extricated [it, by interchanging the time ascribed to the vacant See, with that in which he held it.] through the said
10 months, 17 days, reaching even to the 19th of October
of the following year, in which Leo had been ordained on a Lord's Day;
through 1 year, 7 months, 5 days, I led him to
the 23rd of May of the year 684: after which day, and another vacancy
of 11 months and 20 days, there succeeded
in the Apostolic See, ordained, Benedict II, on the 14th
of May, likewise on a Lord's Day. Thus far in this
Chronology I persist: because I have not yet seen anything effective to the contrary:
but by it I seem to have escaped all
the difficulties, which to Labbe seemed inexplicable.
[3] It pleases not to reweave those things here at greater length, nor to reproduce
the Sermon, which Leo gave on the day of his Ordination, or
its Octave, as Lucas Holstenius thinks; under this beginning:
The pleasantness of today's feast invites us, The decree of election sent to Constantinople, Most beloved,
your fraternal concord in Christ with humble voice
to exhort, etc. Nor does it please more to reproduce
the Formula of the Decree, concerning the election of the same Leo
sent to the Princes; to which while a response is awaited at Constantinople,
it happened often in that age that the Interpontifices were
longer; since indeed not from the day of Election,
but of Consecration were reckoned the beginnings of Pontificates. The Decree begins:
Since not without the nod of the divine mercy is it, that
thus after the death of the supreme Pontiff, into
the election of one all the votes concur, etc. the sermon on the day of Ordination
I pass rather to the Life, as in Anastasius the Librarian
it is described, to be illustrated with Notes: if
one word I shall have premised about his cult. He had it on this day,
as I said, Leo the first, translated, already before the middle of the 8th century,
in which was written the old Roman Calendar,
by John Fronto published at Paris. Gregory
the Great, in his Sacramentary (if here there is nothing from the hand of an interpolator)
for the word Translatio, for Leo the First once inscribed on this day in the Fasti wrote Birthday
of S. Leo the Pope, certainly the First, since indeed the Second
sat nearly eighty years after Gregory. The same,
and not another, understood Wandelbertus of Prüm, in his
metric Martyrology, where he says:
By a Prelate the fourth (before the Kalends of July) rejoices,
and by a Doctor of the word, Leo.
In no other sense also speaks, augmented among the Monks of S. Genoveva,
Usuardus, on the same day, The Birthday of blessed
Leo the Pontiff and Doctor.
[4] But truly, after the Second of this name, raised from
his burial, together with the Third and Fourth, in
the oratory of Leo IV the Pope, the Second succeeded among the more recent, translated by Paschal III. of holy recollection the Lord
Paschal the Pope II reposited; as in the description
of the Roman Basilica, from the relation of eyewitnesses wrote
the Roman Presbyter, in the time of Eugenius Pope III (but
that Paschal sat from the year 1099 to 1118) there began
in several Ms. copies of Usuardus, and among very many
more recent, instead of the First, referred to April, to be celebrated
the Second, according to Anastasius on this day deposited:
which finally from Bellinus and others has been retained in the present-day
Roman Martyrology, where is read: His tomb in the Vatican crypts. At Rome, of S. Leo the Pope
the second: of whom also, perhaps from the time of the aforesaid Paschal,
an Office is prescribed with a proper Lesson from
Anastasius, as we find in the printed edition of the year 1479
and others thereafter. His tomb, like also of the other
two, the aforesaid Oratory being destroyed, lest it should hinder
the building of the new basilica, now is shown in the Vatican
crypts, without any singular honor. But whether
elsewhere Relics received thence are had, is hidden from me; while
nearly all wish them to be of the First, if any they have.
[3] That this Pontiff was by country a Sicilian, since
the Author of the Life asserts, no one doubts: but Messina, By country a Sicilian,
as wrote D. Antoninus Languidara, most studious of our work
there, by a certain proper right believes him to be its own. For,
anciently to this city on the northern part
there grew a suburb, which up to
this day the common people call S. Leo's: in which also
in the old Messina and Gallican Breviary, which
we have read preserved up to the time of Pius V, he is believed to have been of Messina, was prescribed
and the Papaleone family is thought thence to have taken its surname,
by Cajetan, in memory of common origin with him. Wherefore
on the gate which leads to the aforesaid suburb, this inscription carved is read;
To God the Best and Greatest, to the Lord Leo II Supreme Pontiff,
their fellow-citizen, where a suburb and church called after him and the Papaleone family. the Senate and People of Messina, the Leonine Gate
placed, dedicated, and gave, in the month of December in the year of Christ. To the same opinion
conspire Silvester Maurolycus, in the Ocean
of Religions, page 92; Stephanus Maurus, in his
Messina the Proto-Metropolis, page 239; Placidus Samperus
of the Society of Jesus, in the Marian Iconology, page 92, Sicilians
all; and Carolus Jongolinus, an Italian of Fano,
in his Hendegraphia, discourse 3, chapter 104, to me by Languidara
indicated: who then adds, that of the same holy
Pontiff the Relics are reverently preserved in the church
of the Fathers Clerks Minor, under the title of S. Agatha;
and that the fame to these very times brought down
flourishes, that his natal house existed
in that place, The people of Aidone also say he was born among them. where now rises the most celebrated convent
of Monte-Vergine, by blessed Eustochia
of Messina founded. These he wrote to me on the Ides
of May, in the year 1687. Yet I would not from Cajetan
dissemble that the inhabitants of the town of Aidone among the
Leontines, likewise as the people of Messina, of S. Leo born among them
glory, and on that title have a church dedicated to him,
with the inscription, To the Lord Leo Pope II,
Citizen and Patron, the Order and People of Aidone
erected this Basilica. Not that their town
is so ancient (inasmuch as founded by the Lombards, who followed Roger
the Count into Sicily, about the year 1090)
but that from the ruins of old Herlita, a once splendid
city, as the remaining ruins still show, it is believed to have arisen,
and that Leo was of Herlita: which
to the Sicilians furthermore to dispute I leave.
ACTA
From Anastasius the Librarian.
Leo II, Roman Pontiff (S.)
BY THE AUTHOR D. P.
[1] Leo, by nation a Sicilian, of his father Paul,
sat ten months, seventeen days;
Scriptures sufficiently instructed; in the Greek and Latin
tongue learned, in chant and psalmody
preeminent, and in their senses by most subtle exercise
polished; in tongue also a Scholar,
eloquent, and by greater reading refined: an exhorter
of all good works, instilling into very many a most flourishing
knowledge: a lover of poverty;
and toward the provision of the needy, not only
with the piety of his mind, but also with the labor of his zeal solicitous.
[2] He received the holy sixth Synod,
which by God's providence lately in the Royal city
was celebrated, written in the Greek tongue, the most pious great Prince
Constantine carrying out and presiding within his royal
Palace, which is called Trullus.
And at the same time with him the Legates of the Apostolic See,
and two Patriarchs, that is
of Constantinople and of Antioch, and a hundred
fifty Bishops; in which were condemned
Cyrus, Sergius, Honorius, Pyrrhus,
Paul and Peter; and also Macarius
with his disciple Stephen; but also Polychronius
the new Simon, who one will and
operation in the Lord Jesus Christ said
and preached, or whoever finally were to preach [it]
and have defended [it]: but it was decreed,
that also now two wills and operations
of the same dispenser Christ and Saviour our God
be said; as the same Synod, most studiously
into Latin translated, declares. Yet
of the aforewritten defenders the chief, namely
Macarius, Stephen, Polychronius and Anastasius,
since they would not recede from their purpose, at Rome
through various Monasteries were thrust away.
[4] Which aforesaid most holy man Leo, absolved
two men in receiving communion, who
from the Royal city with the aforesaid Macarius and the rest
into the Roman city were sent; who not yet
by the Synod had been anathematized, that is Anastasius
the Presbyter and Leontius the Deacon
of the Church of Constantinople, on the day of S. Theophany;
setting forth namely by their own writings
their faith, according to what the holy Synod also determined,
anathematizing namely all
the said heretics; but also the aforewritten men their accomplices,
whom the holy Synod or the Apostolic See
anathematized.
[5] In his times, by the running Imperial command
of the most clement Prince, was restored the church
of the Ravennese, under the ordination of the Apostolic See,
so that, the Archbishop being dead, he who was elected,
according to ancient custom, into the city
of Rome should come to be ordained. He made a constitution,
which is contained in the archive of the Church, that
he who shall be ordained Archbishop, by no custom,
for the use of the Pallium or the various Offices
of the Church, ought to pay; but also that for Maurus,
formerly the Bishop, the anniversary or the agenda
should [not] be celebrated. But also the type of Autocephaly,
which the Archbishops of Ravenna had drawn out for themselves,
for cutting off scandals, to the Apostolic See they restored.
[6] He made a church in the city of Rome beside S.
Bibiana, where also the bodies of the holy Simplicius,
Faustinus and Beatrix and of other Martyrs
he reposited; and dedicated it to the name of S. Paul the Apostle.
By the command of this gracious Pontiff a church beside the Golden Veil,
in honor of B. Sebastian
was built, and also in honor of the Martyr
George, on the 22nd day of February, where also gifts
he offered.
[7] In his times on the sixteenth day of the month
of April, in the eleventh Indiction, the moon
underwent an eclipse. After the Lord's Supper, almost the whole night
it labored in a bloody countenance, and not until after the cock's
crowing did it begin little by little to grow clear, and
to return to its own aspect.
[8] He made one ordination in the month
of June on the twenty-seventh day, Presbyters
nine, Deacons three, Bishops through various
places to the number of twenty-three. He also was buried
at B. Peter the Apostle on the fourth day of the Kalends
of July. And the Episcopate ceased for
11 months, 22 days.
[9] Which also the aforewritten most holy
man, was ordained by three Bishops, that is, Andrew
of Ostia, John of Porto, and the Placentine
of Velletri, for that the Albanensian Church
had by no means a Bishop.
NOTES. D. P.
f George and Macarius.
p These Saints are venerated on the 29th of July, having suffered under Diocletian: but no traces remain any longer of the church of S. Paul beside S. Bibiana: but of the bodies of the Saints what was done, I am eager to learn, for neither does Pancirolius mention them in the Hidden Treasures of the city of Rome.
q In the year 683 having the Dominical letter D, the 22nd of February fell on a Sunday, fit for such an action.
r To the same year 683 all these things uniquely square: it cannot therefore be, that in this year, on the 15th day of August, as Baronius thinks, Leo was first ordained.
s Another reading, of July; but I prefer June: because of this month the 27th day fell on a Saturday of the aforesaid year; of July on a Monday: but Ordinations were wont to be made on a Saturday or Sunday. This furthermore agreement of Sunday and Saturday, as it makes strongly for the year in which they so occur, so against the same, if first on the 15th of August Leo had been ordained. For nothing to the matter makes the election made before the 10th of January: because this at that time did not constitute an absolute Pontiff, until the Emperor's confirmation had been added.
t Otherwise on the Fifth of the Nones of July: but this in the year 684, having the Dominical letter B, was a Sunday, unfit for caring for funerals.
v Otherwise 10 months, 21 days: but the former reading is more apt, because by it Benedict II is had elected in the year 685 on a Sunday, namely the 14th of May; by the Dominical letter A.
x This little appendix seems to be of Anastasius himself, taken from elsewhere; and therefore here referred to the end out of order.
y Juvenal namely being dead, after his return from the aforesaid Council: but it seems that for a longer time, I know not from what cause, that See was vacant, or rather from the series of the Bishops of Albano one or another fell out, who sat before Andrew, known for the year 721.
APPENDIX D. P.
On the body of S. Leo the Pope at Ferrara.
Leo II, Roman Pontiff (S.)
BY THE AUTHOR D. P.
[1] His cult at Ferrara on this day In the year 1660 I and my Master P. Godefridus
Henschenius, setting out for Rome, through Ferrara
passed in the month of November; and among other
churches of that city, we visited on the 12th day of the month
the Parochial church of S. Stephen, and its ornament and brightness
praising, we venerated, set on each side of the choir,
two notable chests, of which the left was said
to contain the body of S. Romanus the Martyr, of
whom there will be place to treat on the 9th of August; but in the right
part the body of S. Leo the Pope II. But we were admonished by him
who was conducting us, P. Andreas Lazarus, an excellent old man,
and well deserving of this work several times, that an Apostolic
Nuncio had forbidden, that it should be venerated as such;
the Romans among themselves maintaining, that the four bodies
of the holy Leos [are] there. dismissed by the command of the Pontifical Nuncio; Discontinued therefore on this day
was the cult, nor was another day substituted; and no Saint
of this name then occurred to us, of whom that body could be
by any probable conjecture we could opine.
For although that it was carried away from Vico-habentia Voghenza
was established; and that there had been a certain Bishop S. Leus
or Leo, to be venerated on the 1st of August, we remembered;
yet we remembered concerning his body at Monte-Feretrano
(whither from destroyed Vico-habentia the Episcopal See
with the Relics of the Saints was translated) to have received documents so clear,
that his presence there did not seem
able to be called into doubt.
[2] Thus, doubtful, we asked to have described for us the one which
on the wall we read, on a marble tablet carved in gilded letters,
Greatest, in the year from the Virgin's Childbearing 1509, on the 3rd of the Kalends
of July, [a doubt being moved concerning the truth of the translation made in the year 1509] under Pope Julius II, Alfonso of Este Duke
III, and Hippolytus his brother, Cardinal of the Holy Roman Church
and Bishop of Ferrara; in this sepulchre, where the ashes of Faustina
once were reposited, the Venerable Jacobus Benzonus,
Bishop and Protomartyr of this church,
found a leaden chest spread with bones,
in which these things carved were read: Here rests
the body of S. Leo, after another of the year 1081 Pontiff and Priest of Christ,
translated hither from Vico-habentia, under Gratian
Bishop of Ferrara, A.D. 1000, on the 16th of the Kalends
of March, in the fourth Indiction. For which reason a supplication being appointed,
by the venerable College of Priests,
most religiously in the same place the same bones were reposited,
in the same year (namely 1509) on the Ides
of July, then falling on a Lord's day, under the course
of the Dominical letter G; as also
in the year 1081, the Dominical letter C running, it is to be observed,
the 14th day of February concurring with a Lord's day;
the number of the year squaring with the number
of the Roman Indiction. Marcus Antonius Guarini, in
the historical Compendium of Ferrarese affairs, page 129, with the chest of Faustina.
recites the aforesaid title, and says that that sepulchre was
inscribed with these letters, To the Departed Spirits. Annia Faustina living
placed [it] for herself. The first letters, indicating it to be a stone sacred to the Departed Spirits, argue Faustina to have been a Gentile: yet that her ashes collected
at some time there lay the inscription does not prove, but rather
the contrary; inasmuch as after Faustina's death it was left
imperfect; because elsewhere namely she was buried. But Guarini praises
the chest, as one of the more beautiful monuments,
which the Ferrarese dominion has.
[3] The same Guarini relates the history of the body brought to Ferrara
of which we treat, in this manner. Anselmus, kinsman
of Aistulf King of the Lombards, [Meanwhile the body is said to have been brought about 754 from Rome to Nonantola,] with the consent
of Huntrudis his wife, about to begin
monastery, under a Privilege of Zacharias
the Pope for it obtained, together with the bodies of the holy
Martyrs Synesius and Theopompus; to whom
then Stephen II, the successor of Zacharias, added
the bodies of the holy Pontiffs and Confessors, in 1006 [from Vico-habentia,]
Silvester and Leo II, about the year
754. Afterward in the year 1006 a pestilence prevailed
through Italy, for whose extinguishing the cause
the Monks of Nonantola first the bodies of the aforesaid holy Martyrs
brought forth, through the diocese
of Bologna processionally to be carried about:
which to their place being brought back, to be carried about
likewise they decreed the body of S. Leo through
the diocese of Ferrara. But its bearers,
when they had come to Vico-habentia, 10 miles
distant from Ferrara, and thence to Ferrara in 1081. there were all extinguished by the pestilence
in the month of April; and so that sacred deposit
remained there, until the year 1081,
when it to Ferrara brought Gratian, as
already has been said. Furthermore the successor of Gratian, Samuel,
in the year 83 of the same century, on the 17th day
of April, by the hand of Gregory the Priest, gave an Instrument,
by which half of the church of S.
Stephen he delivered to the Chapter of the Cathedral church;
but the other, together with the body of S. Leo,
added Guido of Arezzo, under an instrument of the year
92, on the 9th of January, by the hands of Jacobus once
[son] of Peter Antonius: and this donation thereafter
confirmed the Roman Pontiffs, in the year 1187
Gregory VII VIII, in 98 Innocent
III; in 1275 Alexander IV.
[4] The form and situation of the aforesaid chest These things thus asserted by Guarini, if, the instruments themselves being produced,
which are cited, they hold good; it could indeed
be prohibited, that to S. Leo the Pope II in the city
of Ferrara cult be given; but it will not be possible forthwith
to dislodge the citizens from their ingrained and from their ancestors received belief,
that his body, or a great part of it,
is among them; unless perhaps, the chest which at Rome is still shown
being opened, they shall have shown that there is still
held entire the number of sacred bones once reposited. I to prejudge
neither of the contending parties intend; but what I have found,
I simply report: and what our Father John
Paul Senerthus, being asked to send us an accurate description of that chest,
submitted as follows, received from a learned
and pious man.
[5] The body of S. Leo the Pope anciently rested
in a leaden chest, of length about five
palms, and of height one; but this
was enclosed in another chest likewise, but of marble
of the stone commonly called Travertine or Macigno,
inserted in the wall of the church of S. Stephen at the left
side outside the greater chapel; on two bases
so resting, that almost wholly it projected outside the wall
raised above the pavement ten palms.
The form of the chest was altogether flat, on whose front
face these words were read; The Body
of S. Leo the Pope. The cover wrought
with scaly work (such namely as is that of the urn, at the 6th
of June in the second Norbertine Corollary, number 38, represented)
projecting at the four corners as many
human heads of low relief. That chest
was long sixteen, high six palms. the specification of the bones reposited in it. But
now that cover and the bases, shapeless stones,
lie outside the church: but the chest has been made a repository
of another wooden one, sculpted and gilded,
in which the leaden one is enclosed, and at the same time placed
under the high altar, to which was translated the body
of that holy Pontiff, as appears from the title
placed at the right side of the same altar.
On occasion of the translation the leaden chest was opened,
and found therein were three oblong bones,
namely of the legs or hips, with the bone commonly
called Scio (Ischion), some little ribs and many ashes,
and nothing else. The body therefore is said to be a notable
part of the body, which to be present among the Ferrarese, they will not,
I believe, wish to deny, the Romans, unless the same which here
are named bones, the sepulchre likewise being opened, they are prepared
to show. Accordingly deservedly will the Ferrarese act, that their
ancient use be restored to them.