Genesius the Mime

25 August · commentary

ON ST. GENESIUS THE MIME, MARTYR AT ROME,

At the end of the III century or the beginning of the IV.

PRELIMINARY COMMENTARY.

The Saint's wonderful conversion, his memory in the ancient Martyrologies, the time of his martyrdom, the Acts, and their various copies.

Genesius, mime and M. at Rome (St.)

BY THE AUTHOR G. C.

The prodigious power of divine grace

we evidently recognize in

this Saint, who was then suddenly converted

to the Christian faith

when he was publicly exposing the sacred mysteries

of that same faith to the mockery of the heathen,

This Saint wonderfully and hence we learn how incomprehensible

are the judgments of God and his hidden ways,

by which he leads certain men to eternal salvation.

Two like miracles of divine grace

have already occurred in our Work at the day XXVII

of February and the XIV of April, to which may be added

at the day XV of September the sudden conversion of holy

Porphyrius the mime, who, receiving baptism in jest

before Julian the apostate, being suddenly changed

by the power of God, professed himself a Christian;

and presently, by his order, being struck with the axe, was crowned

with martyrdom, as the Roman Martyrology on that

day will announce.

[2] made a Martyr from an actor Doubtless Theodoret, bishop of Cyrus, designates these

examples of wonderful conversions, when

in Sermon VIII On the Martyrs, in the edition of our Jacques

Sirmond, tom. 4 of his Works, page

606, he sets forth the various conditions of the Martyrs in these

words: Let us examine who they were, and whence

sprung, who were endowed with this grace. Were they perhaps

certain famous and illustrious men, who boasted of the nobility

of their birth, or flowed about with abundance of riches,

or had been made renowned by some power?

By no means, O men! None of these things had they;

but they were private and common men.

And some of them even menservants and maidservants,

who in weak bodies fought nobly;

others drawing chastely the yoke of matrimony,

others not yet having known marriage. But I hear

that some also, brought up on the stage, suddenly

passed over into the order of athletes, and, being made victors,

obtained the crown, and, after they had been proclaimed,

struck the demons with great terror,

to whom they had once been subject. Nay, many

priests also and temple-wardens raised trophies against*

impiety. Out of such men, then, and women

the choirs of the Martyrs were made up. Here Theodoret

seems to allude to St. Genesius and like

actors, who suddenly passed over into the order of Martyrs,

and migrated from the stage or theatre to heaven.

[3] Whatever be Theodoret's intention, this our today's

Martyr is celebrated in the most ancient Fasti of the Church

at the day XXIV or XXV of August.

The Hieronymian Martyrologies, in Florentinius,

on the 24th day of August or the next; and Wandelbert in Usuard illustrated

in our Sollier, announce on the XXIV day of this month

the memory of holy Genesius the Martyr at Rome.

But Ado, Usuard, and the old Roman Martyrology

of Rosweyde defer his feast to

the following day, in whose footsteps we tread

with the present Roman Martyrology,

which adorns that same holy Martyr with this

eulogy: Likewise at Rome, of holy Genesius the martyr,

who, being first a mime in heathenism, when in the theatre,

the emperor Diocletian looking on, he was mocking the mysteries

of the Christians, being inspired by God,

was suddenly converted to the faith and baptized. Presently,

by the emperor's order, being most cruelly beaten with cudgels, then

hung upon the rack, and vexed by a very long tearing

with claws, and inflamed also with torches,

when he persisted in the faith of Christ, saying:

There is no king but Christ, for whom if I be slain a thousand times,

ye shall not be able to take him from my mouth,

nor him from my heart; he earned the palm of martyrdom

by the cutting off of his head.

[4] We do not know whether this Martyr is honored on the same day in

the most ancient Carthaginian Calendar, is celebrated in the ancient Martyrologies,

since the day of the yearly festival is there erased, and its place

is filled up with points in Mabillon, tom. 3 of the Analecta,

page 412, in this manner:

Kal. Sept., of holy Genesius the mime. But more expressly

on the XXV day of August the Birthday of St. Genesius is celebrated

in the old Roman Calendar which Jean

Fronteau, Canon Regular, published at Paris in the year 1652,

and whose antiquity must be placed before the year

of Christ 731, as the editor there praised proves in the Prefatory notes, §2. With Fronteau

and others we think it more likely that in this Roman Calendar

there is announced St. Genesius of Rome

rather than the martyr of Arles of the same name,

of whom we shall treat below. But this

opinion seems to us far more probable, because

St. Genesius of Rome for many centuries had at Rome

a church called by his name, whose

roof Pope Gregory III newly restored before the year of Christ

741, as is read in the newest Roman edition

of Anastasius the Librarian, tom. 4,

page 202 or sect. 199.

[5] Even more probably there pertains to St. Genesius of Rome,

the martyr made from an actor, the church and even today in Italy of which

Florentinius in the Notes to the Hieronymian Martyrology

at the day XXV of August narrates the following:

A solemn day is that of holy Genesius, whether the Roman

or the Arlesian, on this very day XXV of August in

a village of Lucca called Bargecchia, where there is a church

dedicated to his name, and a yearly prodigy,

seen also by me in our own age,

endures; nor have I thought it foreign to note it here briefly to the glory of the holy

Martyr. On the eve of the feast of holy Genesius

(ancient images there seem to indicate a mime, and Rabanus commemorates a mime

on this day) a great concourse is made from the neighboring peoples

to that church: for they who labor under the falling

sickness, thronged about by their households or kinsfolk,

for healing or for marvels, being alone set round about,

go eagerly to the church.

[6] he is honored near the city of Lucca. Scarcely do they who labor under a disease of this kind touch that sacred

ground, when at once they are seized

with an epileptic assault, and, having fallen to the ground, are carried by the hands of the pious

to the porch of the church,

and through the whole night of the vigil, by the help of others, they are borne

from the porch to a cross set at the far edge of that sacred

ground, and borne back again, vexed by very frequent

paroxysms of the disease. Very many obtain entire

health; as for the rest, it is a constant report

that for a year they are no longer seized by the disease. All

these things are yearly obvious to the eyes of all who stand by,

worthy to be reckoned among those marvels

which God has willed to be perpetual as genuine signs of the Church.

Hence the surrounding peoples call epilepsy

the disease of holy Genesius,

and against him who knows not how to stand in his place they cast this proverb:

He has touched the ground of holy Genesius.

In this matter we give credit to Florentinius, an eyewitness,

and we are not ignorant that elsewhere, through the intercession of the Saints,

like yearly miracles occur.

Let these things said about the immemorial and hitherto persevering

worship of our holy Martyr

suffice. Now we shall try to assign approximately

the time of this martyrdom.

[7] The time of the Passion is inquired into, The most eminent Baronius in the Ecclesiastical Annals

refers the martyrdom of this St. Genesius to the year

of Christ 303, num. 118, in these words: Then

also Genesius the mime furnished a remarkable spectacle to the City,

who in the theatre, the emperor looking on,

when he was mocking the mysteries of the Christians,

being suddenly changed by the power of God, began to act in earnest

what before he was wont to act in jest; even to the point that, being perfectly

made a Christian, and having confessed Christ with a loud voice,

and being harried with torments, he at length obtained

the crown of martyrdom. Pagi therefore erred

when, in the Historico-chronological Criticism upon

the Annals of Baronius, at the year of Christ 303, num. 10,

he thus wrote: About this holy Genesius Baronius has not a word

in the Annals, although he speaks of him

in the Notes to the Roman Martyrology

at the day XXV of August, on which, like the other holy

Genesius of Arles, of whom presently, he is honored.

Hence, as I think, it came about that Mombritius and

certain others made one out of two Genesii,

which was the easier, in that the Arlesian also suffered in this

century. Besides the evident error

which Pagi here commits about the silence of Cardinal

Baronius, he also not obscurely

hints that St. Genesius of Rome suffered at the beginning of the IV century,

or in the year of Christ 303.

[8] about which the chronologers dispute, But this chronology of Baronius certain manuscript

copies of the Acts contradict, and

place the martyrdom of St. Genesius of Rome under the fourth

consulate of Diocletian, which falls in the year of Christ

290. But Tillemont, tom. 4 of the Ecclesiastical Monuments,

page 695, contends that to these interpolated

and longer Acts not much credit is to be attributed,

since Diocletian in the year of Christ

290 was not at Rome. But although Diocletian

in the year of Christ 303 celebrated his vicennalia at Rome,

yet Ruinart, in the preliminary admonition

to the Passion of this St. Genesius, which he published at Paris

in the year 1689 among the Sincere and select Acts of the Martyrs,

in the same place, pages 282 and following,

timidly rejects this year in these words: The death of holy Genesius

Cardinal Baronius refers to the year CCCIII; but although it is not altogether certain

and ascertained in what year it happened, yet it

seems more likely that it befell earlier.

[9] Tillemont in the place just cited assails the chronology

of the most eminent Baronius with certain small reasons not

to be despised, and which we assign approximately, although these do not prove the matter

evidently enough, and from some conjectures

he fixes the glorious contest of St. Genesius in the year of Christ

285 or 286. Since Diocletian in the year

of Christ 284 was chosen emperor by the soldiers,

against this Tillemontian arrangement of times there seems to stand

the kindness or leniency which that emperor showed toward the Christians in the first

times of his reign,

as Eusebius of Caesarea, book 8 of the Ecclesiastical History,

chapter 1, testifies. Whence Ruinart in

the Preface to the Sincere Acts of the Martyrs, page LVIII

of the above-said Paris edition, sets the beginning of the first

Diocletianic persecution at the year of Christ 293.

Since amid these chronological tangles

we stick fast in uncertainty, at the beginning of this Commentary

above, in the margin, we placed the martyrdom of our St. Genesius

broadly about the end of the third century or the beginning of the fourth.

Now it remains that we

forewarn the curious reader about the various printed and manuscript

copies of the Acts.

[10] Laurentius Surius in the Lives of the Saints at

the day XXV of August published in print the longer Acts

of St. Genesius, and, the longer Acts of him being omitted, which do not please severe censors,

and are commonly accused of interpolation by the learned.

Tillemont is displeased by the opening in them, which

in Surius runs thus: In the reign of the emperor Diocletian,

when for four years all the churches had been closed,

there was at Rome a certain mime, Genesius by name.

At these words of the Acts Tillemont, tom.

4 of the Ecclesiastical Monuments, page 694, observes that the most savage

persecution of Diocletian, which began in the year

of Christ 303, lasted only two years,

and that at that time the churches of the Christians were not

only closed but destroyed. But if anyone

should wish to refer these things to the earlier persecution of Diocletian,

the critic alleged in the same place asks him

whence he knows that the churches of the Christians were then everywhere

closed for four years, as those Acts hint: for

if that persecution had lasted so long, he says,

and all the churches had been closed, Eusebius of Caesarea

would not have kept silence about it in his Ecclesiastical History.

[11] Besides, Tillemont disapproves another narration

about St. Genesius, which seem interpolated, which in the same Acts is thus

read: But when now all the secrets of the divine mysteries

were completed, he was clothed

in white garments, and distributed bread and sweetmeats

and wax tapers. The close of this period supposes

that in the time of Diocletian it was set in custom among

the Christians that the newly baptized should distribute bread,

wax tapers, and other things. But Tillemont

thinks that these ceremonies only began to be used

in the following centuries, when the Christians

enjoyed full liberty of celebrating the mysteries of their religion.

These and like things, which offend Tillemont,

occur also in most of the manuscript codices and copies of our Museum,

in one of which, as also in the Trier copy

of St. Maximin, the Acts of that same St. Genesius thus

begin: In the reign of Diocletian, when for four years there had ceased

the bishops and priests of the Church &c. Florentinius in the Annotations

to the Hieronymian Martyrology, page 775, assigns a like reading

from a certain codex of his own,

and prefers it to the other. But that beginning of the Acts

displeases Tillemont more than the other

related above, since the Church has always had

bishops and priests, and never at Rome have

such administrators of the Christian religion altogether

ceased for four years.

[12] the shorter ones from three Ms. codices These difficulties raised against the Surian Acts and others like them,

which seem grave enough,

do not occur in the brief Passion of that same Martyr,

which Ruinart in the year 1689 at Paris published from page

283 among the Sincere and select Acts of the Martyrs

from three Ms. codices, as in the preliminary admonition

he declares in these words: The Acts of this blessed

Martyr we have indeed found in several Ms. codices,

but in three only pure and sincere,

which Ado wrote out almost entire in his Martyrology.

But of the three codices which

we have used, the first is of the Colbert library;

the second from the library of the RR. FF. Discalced Carmelites

of Paris; the third at length given as a gift to our library

of Saint-Germain by that most distinguished man

Antoine d'Hérouval. All fair

appraisers of antiquity praise these Acts of Ruinart,

and from them we gather that today's

announcement of Ado was taken from the genuine Acts of St. Genesius.

[13] published by Ruinart we shall reprint, Yet in Ruinart's Passion and in the Martyrology

of Ado there occurs a certain mode of speaking

which can scarcely be reconciled with Tillemont's

chronology: for in both those Acts Diocletian

is called a most savage tyrant, to whom

the Christians were hateful. But in the chronological system

of Tillemont and of others, who fix the martyrdom

of St. Genesius at the year of Christ 285 or 286,

that appellation did not then fit Diocletian,

who in the first times of his reign showed himself mild and

gentle toward the Christians, as we indicated above in passing

from the testimony of Eusebius of Caesarea. Hence Tillemont himself,

tom. 4 of the Ecclesiastical Monuments, page 695, freely concedes that

that surname of a most savage tyrant and hater of the Christians

was perhaps here added by those who

afterwards transcribed the original Acts of St. Genesius.

[14] and we shall compare it with the Utrecht Ms. Among the various copies of the Acts, which

are commonly like the Surian Acts, we have preserved in our Museum

a brief copy which Rosweyde once caused to be written out from a Ms.

codex of the Carthusians of Utrecht. In that Utrecht copy,

which comes nearest to the Acts of Ruinart and

of Ado, no mention is made of

the cruelty or hatred of Diocletian against the Christians,

so that it may seem purer than the other copies in this

part. Yet since in it there is

related one episode or another which is omitted

in the sincere Acts, we shall not put that Utrecht copy

to the press; but we shall reprint Ruinart's

edition of that same Passion collated with our copy,

and, illustrating it with the accustomed observations, we shall also assign

in the Annotations or in the margin the various readings of greater

moment.

Annotations

* that is, sacristans

THE PASSION

by an anonymous author,

From the edition of Ruinart, which we have collated with the Ms. copy of the Carthusians of Utrecht.

Genesius, mime and M. at Rome (St.)

BHL Number: 3315

FROM THE PRINTED EDITIONS.

Genesius, publicly exposing the mysteries of the Christians to mockery, Blessed Genesius, when he was in the city of Rome a master

of the mimic art of the thymele a, who, standing, sang

upon the platform which was called themele,

and was an imitator of human affairs: and on a certain

day, when he wished to exhibit to the emperor Diocletian

a play about the mysteries of Christian observance —

inasmuch as he was a most savage tyrant, to whom the Christians were

hateful b — and for the sake of this matter, the Emperor

and all the people looking on, lying down in the midst of the theatre as though sick,

he asked to be baptized, and set forth the mime

in these words: Come, my friends, I feel myself heavy;

I wish to be made light. They answered:

How shall we make thee light, if thou art

heavy? Are we perchance carpenters, and are we going to put thee

to the plane? These words raised a laugh

in the people.

[2] Genesius again: Madmen, I desire to die

a Christian. is suddenly converted to their faith, Why? they say. To whom Genesius:

That on that day I may be found as a fugitive in God c.

But a presbyter and an exorcist being called

d, suddenly, God inspiring him, he believed. For

when they had sat down beside his bed, they say

to him: Why hast thou sent for us, little son? Genesius, now

not feignedly and in pretence, but from a pure heart, answered:

Because I desire to receive the grace of Christ, by

which, being reborn, I may be freed from the ruin of my iniquities.

And when they had completed the mysteries of the Sacraments,

and he had been clothed in white garments, being seized as though

in the play by soldiers, and, after the likeness

of the holy martyrs, presented to the Emperor to be examined

about the name of Christ, standing in a higher

place e, he thus made his speech.

[3] Hear, Emperor, and all the army,

the wise men and the peoples of this city. and having earnestly professed it, As often as

I heard a Christian even named, I shuddered,

and insulted those who remained in confession.

I even execrated my parents and kinsfolk f for the sake

of the Christian name, and held the Christians in such

derision that I searched out their mysteries with diligent

examination, that from their consecration I might wish

to exhibit a play to you. But

when the water touched me naked, and, being asked,

I answered that I believed, I saw above me a hand

coming from heaven, and radiant angels standing over me,

who recited from a book all the sins which I had done

from infancy; which g presently they washed

in that very water in which I was drenched in your sight,

and afterwards showed it to me whiter than snow.

Now therefore, illustrious Emperor, and

all ye peoples who have laughed at these mysteries,

believe with me that Christ is the true Lord,

that he is the light, that he is the truth, that he is

mercy, and that through him ye can attain

unto pardon.

[4] is crowned with the laurel of martyrdom. At these things the Emperor h Diocletian, being most vehemently

indignant, straightway, after he had been most cruelly beaten with cudgels,

handed him over to the prefect Plautianus to be compelled to sacrifice:

by whom, being hung upon the rack

and vexed with a very long tearing of the claws,

and inflamed also with torches, when he persisted in the faith,

saying: There is no king save him

whom I have seen; and I adore and worship him; and for his

worship, if I be slain a thousand times, I shall be his, as I have begun.

Christ from my mouth, Christ from my

heart the torments shall not be able to take away. For I greatly

repent that I erred, in that formerly I shuddered at the holy name

in holy men, and too late came as a proud soldier

to adore the true King; he earned

the crown of martyrdom by the cutting off of his head i. Then Plutianus k

the prefect, hearing these things, ordered him to be beheaded on the spot. And

the blessed martyr Genesius was beheaded on the VIII l of the Kalends

of September m, our Lord Jesus

Christ granting it, who lives and reigns through all ages of ages.

Amen.

ANNOTATIONS.

al. Ne*

al. a Deo*

Notes

a. It is derived from the Greek θυμέλη, which signified a higher place in which the gesticulators were wont to dance or to entertain the bystanders with ridiculous gestures, as Ruinart observes in the notes. In our Utrecht Ms. the Saint is more clearly called a master of the mimic art.
b. What is here recorded of the savagery and hatred of Diocletian against the Christians at that time is not read in the Utrecht Ms. copy, and perhaps was afterwards added to these Acts by someone, as we warned at num. 13 of the preliminary Commentary.
c. In other Ms. codices and copies this period is thereupon thus expressed: *Lest on that day I be found as a fugitive from God.* Although these seem at first sight contrary, yet they can be so understood as to make almost the same sense: for Genesius perhaps wishes to signify that he seeks baptism lest on the day of judgment he be found a fugitive or a stranger from God, without baptism; or that, being buried together with Christ through baptism — as the Apostle in the epistle to the Romans, chapter 6, ℣. 4, writes — he may be found in God a fugitive from unbelief or from heathenism.
d. That is, other actors were called who should play mimically the parts of a presbyter and an exorcist, as Tillemont and others warn.
e. In the Utrecht Ms. and other copies this is thus read: *Ascending upon the base where a statue of Venus had been, he thus made his speech.*
f. Since Genesius had had Christian parents and kinsfolk, it is nothing wonderful that he knew the ceremonies of baptism, as Ruinart noted.
g. The sense seems to require that *quem* be read for *quæ*, so that that relative may refer to the book, which the angels afterwards showed him whiter than snow. This reading is confirmed from the Utrecht copy, which narrates the same matter in these words: *When therefore I had been baptized with water, likewise that book also, being drenched, was made whiter than snow, so that it did not even show a sign of the writing that had been there before.*
h. Here in the Utrecht Ms. the following episode is inserted: *Then the emperor, kindled with fury, ordered all who had rehearsed the play with him to be brought before him and stoutly beaten with rods, thinking that they likewise believed. But they began to blaspheme the holy name with reproach, saying: We rehearsed it otherwise. But this man, being made mad, dismissed his own mirth and took upon himself the lamentation of Christianity, and for this let him alone experience what he alone has done. Then the emperor, raging against Genesius &c.* Although this episode is read also in the longer Acts, yet it does not seem to us likely enough, and therefore we were unwilling to publish our Utrecht Ms. in print, as we briefly indicated at the end of the preliminary Commentary.
i. Here the Acts end in the Utrecht copy, and Ruinart in the notes warns that the following clause is found in the Codex of the FF. Carmelites of Paris alone.
k. That prefect is called above Plautianus; but in the Utrecht copy he is called Plusianus.
l. Some codices and copies have that this Saint was crowned with the laurel of martyrdom on the ninth, others on the eighth of the Kalends of September, and hence certain Martyrologies record him on one day or the other, as we said at num. 3 of the preliminary Commentary.
m. Here in some Ms. codices and transcripts there is added the fourth consulate of Diocletian, and in others none is expressed. But since Diocletian at the time of his fourth consulate was not at Rome, Tillemont contends that that note of time is faulty and to be reckoned as nothing, as we related in the preliminary Commentary, num. 8.

Feedback

Noticed an error, have a suggestion, or want to share a thought? Let me know.

Support the Translation

The Acta Sanctorum has never been available in English. This site is translating all of it: January through July are done, August is underway, and the calendar runs to November 10, where the Bollandists stopped in 1940. The scholarship pipeline is built; what remains is a compute bill. Contributions go directly to translating more of the calendar.

The Acta was a funded enterprise for three centuries; the translation runs the same way. Everything here is free and stays free whether you give or not. Wroot Press is a small independent press — an imprint of Wroot Labs LLC, not a charity. Contributions aren't tax-deductible; they buy compute.